Dear Linda,

Firstly, I would like to remain on this list. Secondly, I just submitted a
paper for AERA 2010 and under the section for which topic area one's paper
fits, I did not happen to see a Foucualt option...perhaps I have missed
something? My paper is both in the special education SIG as well as Foucault
SIG, but am happy to present it through the Foucault one if accepted.

If you could advise me as to what to do I will happily put in a request for
it to be sent to the Foucault SIG for review.

All the best,

Julia Rafal

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Linda Graham
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Dear Foucault List and SIG Members,
>
> Firstly, my apologies if this goes to folks who have recently requested
> removal from the listserv.  We will action that as soon as we can but we
> also have busy schedules, so if you wish to be removed, please just send a
> request to delete your details from the Foucault list directly to Christine
> or I and this will help reduce traffic to the whole list.
>
> However, it is very pleasing to see that the main volume of emails to the
> list are those requesting to remain on it!  Thank you to each of you for
> your interest and commitment.
>
> Overnight I received an email from AERA management and there are a few
> changes that I want to share with the list as these will affect the future
> of the SIG.  These relate to the administrative culling of small SIGs, the
> new process of review and lastly, the new AERA session allocation method:
>
> 1. Membership Minimums: As in past years, AERA will take the official
> membership count on June 30. SIGs with fewer than 45 members, the minimum
> number of members required for a SIG in good standing, will be notified that
> they have one year to increase their membership to that minimum.
>
> 2. Review Panels: This is the time when you and your program committee are
> creating the review panels to rate the submissions for the 2010 Annual
> Meeting program. Smaller SIGs may wish to share panel members, or panels on
> specific topics with another SIG or division with similar interests.
>
> On the first topic, I urge those of you who do want to see the Foucault SIG
> remain as a space for critical theoretical work to make sure that your
> Foucault SIG membership is up to date.  This is easily done when you renew
> your AERA membership. It is not a matter of funding I can assure you as
> Christine and I have kept the membership rates lower than other SIGs.  It is
> a matter of keeping the SIG viable for, as you can see from the above AERA
> communication, those with less than 45 members will be forced to justify
> their existence.
>
> As to the second, I have to admit I'm still confused and somewhat
> ambivalent about the review panel idea. In any case, it excludes graduate
> students from the review process (they can still review but their scores are
> not counted). Christine has objected about this process to AERA management,
> particularly because of its affect on small SIGs but ... to no avail.
>
> 3. My final point is an important one:  the SIGs presence at AERA has been
> seriously dwindling over the last few years because AERA have changed how
> they allocate sessions.  It is now allocated on number of proposals
> submitted - not number of SIG members, as it used to be.
>
> This has drastically affected us.  For example, in 2007 we received about
> 34 proposals and were allocated 19 slots (mainly individual paper sessions
> and we massaged this up to 21 by requesting longer sessions - not ideal but
> better than rejecting good papers).  In 2008 however, we only received 11
> proposals and were granted 4 slots - all individual roundtables.  This also
> has implications for the presence of SIG members at the conference as one of
> our international presenters couldn't get funding to present at a roundtable
> and so didn't come (this is common in Australia also).  So basically in 2008
> we had three people present in the Foucault SIG.
>
> This can't continue.  Therefore I ask folks to remember the Foucault SIG
> when they renew their AERA membership and, if you are hatching something
> Foucauldianesque right now, do submit it to the SIG for Denver in 2010.
>
> Christine and I will be getting back to you soon with some plans for a
> revitalisation of the SIG that will hopefully broaden the church to include
> those members now experimenting with Agamben, Deleuze, Butler and so on.  We
> raised this at the 2009 SIG Business Meeting - although one of the people
> most interested in the reasons for change happened to be a right-wing member
> of the press!  Her question was "So, why don't people like Foucault?"
>
> We gleefully gave her a number of reasons, so she probably doesn't like us
> now but let me remind you, this SIG's reason for being is to act as a space
> for those who do.  (ie., Welcome Joseph Kurz, new program co-chair!)
>
> I hope you all continue to submit your work and, if you do attend AERA next
> year, please come to the Business Meeting.
>
> Regards,
>
> Linda (2010 Foucault SIG Chair and Program Co-Chair)
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr Linda J. Graham
> Macquarie University Research Fellow
> Children and Families Research Centre
> Faculty of Human Sciences
> Macquarie University  NSW  2109
>
> An American Educational Research Association List
>
> If you need assistance with this list, please send an email to
> [log in to unmask]
>



-- 
Julia Rafal
Marshall Scholar 2006 - Present
Faculty of Education, PhD Student
Homerton College, University of Cambridge
Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 8PH
Mobile: +44 (0)780 9601660

An American Educational Research Association List

If you need assistance with this list, please send an email to [log in to unmask]